Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 22:07:58 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: Re: [patch] optional new raw sha1 implemetation On 2012-06-15 21:13, magnum wrote: > On 2012-06-15 20:02, Tavis Ormandy wrote: >> 5% improvement is nice, but I'm dissapointed it's not higher. Could >> you send >> me a .o file? I would like to disassemble it and see where GCC goes >> wrong, >> hopefully there's a simple way to fix it. >> >> Version 3 attached. > > Tavis, > > I have committed this to magnum-jumbo for now, although it won't make it > into a Jumbo release in the current form (magnum-jumbo is not really an > official repo, but in the end most of it is likely to be the next Jumbo > release). > > The current plugin "system" can't handle requirements like SSSE4, OpenCL > >= x.y or CUDA/OpenCl. So any format that has such prerequistes are > currently non-plugins (the only difference is two lines + #ifdefs in > john.c, see eg. rawSHA256_fmt.c for an example). I now turned the format into a non-plugin, depending on __SSE4_1__. This renews my thoughts that we should have native build targets, eg. linux-x86-64-native, that includes -march=native or whatever is needed to enable everything available. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.