Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 09:22:30 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: rawSHA1_LI internals On 06/08/2012 09:11 AM, magnum wrote: > BTW Jim, I'm just now comparing rawSHA1_fmt_plug.c and > rawSHA1_LinkedIn_fmt_plug.c using meld. I notice cmp_all() is unchanged. > I must be missing something, how can this work? We should only look at > binary but as far as I can see this is not the case. I know the code > works, but how!? > > Also, I really think half of the self-tests should have the zeroed bits. Here is a patch that does what I mean. I just don't understand how it can possibly work without this patch. BTW the new self-tests fails unless this is done to cmp_all(). magnum View attachment "0001-raw-sha1_li-self-tests-and-modified-cmp_all.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1761 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.