Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 02:03:55 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: memory usage within JtR and possible ways to significantly
 reduce it.

On 05/28/2012 08:30 PM, Solar Designer wrote:
> magnum -
> 
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 08:26:52PM +0200, magnum wrote:
>> No problem at all, I'll just revert them and it will propagate down to
>> other's branches. We could either leave it in bleeding-jumbo (fairly
>> logical unless we want to run that one during the contest), or revert it
>> from there too and create a testing-jumbo. This might be "bleeding-jumbo
>> plus experimental stuff" whereas bleeding-jumbo is supposed to be
>> exactly the same as magnum-jumbo but rebased upon latest CVS.
> 
> Makes sense.  This choice (re-purpose bleeding-jumbo vs. create
> testing-jumbo) is up to you.  I just want the main magnum-jumbo to stay
> without this stuff for now.

These patches are now reverted in magnum-jumbo. They are kept in
bleeding-jumbo.

magnum

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.