Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 02:03:55 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: memory usage within JtR and possible ways to significantly reduce it. On 05/28/2012 08:30 PM, Solar Designer wrote: > magnum - > > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 08:26:52PM +0200, magnum wrote: >> No problem at all, I'll just revert them and it will propagate down to >> other's branches. We could either leave it in bleeding-jumbo (fairly >> logical unless we want to run that one during the contest), or revert it >> from there too and create a testing-jumbo. This might be "bleeding-jumbo >> plus experimental stuff" whereas bleeding-jumbo is supposed to be >> exactly the same as magnum-jumbo but rebased upon latest CVS. > > Makes sense. This choice (re-purpose bleeding-jumbo vs. create > testing-jumbo) is up to you. I just want the main magnum-jumbo to stay > without this stuff for now. These patches are now reverted in magnum-jumbo. They are kept in bleeding-jumbo. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.