Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 01:49:49 +0530 From: SAYANTAN DATTA <std2048@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: cl_khr_byte_addressable_store On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Milen Rangelov <gat3way@...il.com> wrote: > Well especially for RAR on AMD, I had several attempts around that idea > and they ended much slower than the vectorized, bitwise magic version. But > you should leave it just because 4xxx is not supported. > I think none of the current opencl format except mine( opencl-mscah2) runs on 4000 series hardware. We could have two versions of kernels one for 4000 series and another for 5000 series or above. I know sometimes it's hard and it could get VERY UGLY (my rar kernel is > frightening). > Yeah I faced the same problem while porting the cpu version of mscash2 to gpu (ATi 4890). Lot of changes had to be made in each line and debugging becomes a true nightmare. Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.