Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 10:27:23 +0200 From: Samuele Giovanni Tonon <samu@...uxasylum.net> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: OpenCL runtime errors On 04/11/2012 09:11 AM, magnum wrote: > On 04/11/2012 05:59 AM, Solar Designer wrote: >> magnum, Lukas, all - >> >> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 01:11:57AM +0200, magnum wrote: >>> While experimenting with RAR I found a detail that stops many runtime >>> errors similar to the ones mentioned - and makes adjustment to different >>> devices (including really weak ones) easier. Most current OpenCL formats >>> (I think all except mine) use this to determine the device's maximum >>> local worksize: >>> (...) >> >> Great. I see that you've already implemented it for RAR. Who is to do >> it for the rest - the authors of those other pieces of code, or you? > > Not sure. I was hoping Samuele would find a good shared find_best_lws() > function for common-opencl.c but I realise it might be tricky to get one > work for any slow or fast format. At the moment i'm quite stuck with private matters to take the time to look at it, so i don't want to "lock" any development, feel free to change it on my code too. cheers Samuele
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.