Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 14:34:52 +0100 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: OpenCL KPC and LWS On 03/08/2012 01:07 PM, I wrote: > From bench.c the benchmarking is made just knowing function pointers to > init(), set_salt(), set_key() and crypt_all(). The only difference here > is we want to modulate lws and kpc. > > For the lws enumeration I think we just need a pointer to crypt_kernel. > > For kpc you do a lot of specific things - but these are just mimicing > crypt_all(). Why not actually use crypt_all(num) instead? This (and > using set_key() and set_salt() instead of memsets) will ensure we > actually measure the same way as the real deal. > > I will experiment a little with this. OK, the problem with this approach is we can't use queue profiling. I have this working using other means but I'm not sure how good it is. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.