Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:04:28 +0100 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: generic crypt [was: OpenCL support on OSX] On 01/31/2012 10:24 PM, Solar Designer wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:16:23PM +0100, magnum wrote: >> I'm not sure why we don't just include c3_fmt.o in the main object list >> and wrap that whole source file in #ifdef HAVE_CRYPT. Solar? > > We could, but would this simplify anything? We're adding extra object > files in many Linux and Solaris targets anyway (well, not in all). Nevermind. But speaking of crypt, I now noticed that FreeBSD et al do not use c3_fmt. Is that because they would probably not give us any new format? It could still be usable for verifying MD5's for longer than 15 chars, and such things. And they may introduce new stuff, just like DragonFly BSD. BTW it seems OSX do have a crypt(3) capable of original DES and the one with _salt (From memory that's BSDI, right?). Would it not work with HAVE_CRYPT? Not that it would add anything useful to John, except showing how much faster optimised bitslice DES is compared to crypt calls :) magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.