Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:32:41 -0500
From: Rich Rumble <>
Subject: Re: Fork=n

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Solar Designer <> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:40:41PM -0500, Rich Rumble wrote:
> I'm not familiar with Windows.  How do you know these 1 GB's are not
> mostly shared between the four processes?
Same here :) All I know is the Process Monitor Graph goes WAAAYYY up
and with each of the 4 forks I kill 1G is roughly cut off the graph/read out.
Those figures I know nothing about, I just used the WMIC command
wmic process where (description="john.exe") to get the figures quickly
to copy/paste what the GUI process monitor was showing. Again it's
an observation/assumption I made, thought I'd pass it on. Cygwin could
very well be handling things (more)poorly than *nix in this instance.
>> Loaded 12264106 password hashes with 4096 different salts (Traditional
>> DES [128/128 BS SSE2])
>> Remaining 12159811 password hashes with 4096 different salts
> Impressive.
It's what I get for watching the KoreLogic twatter feed :)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.