Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:32:41 -0500 From: Rich Rumble <richrumble@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Fork=n On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:40:41PM -0500, Rich Rumble wrote: > I'm not familiar with Windows. How do you know these 1 GB's are not > mostly shared between the four processes? Same here :) All I know is the Process Monitor Graph goes WAAAYYY up and with each of the 4 forks I kill 1G is roughly cut off the graph/read out. Those figures I know nothing about, I just used the WMIC command wmic process where (description="john.exe") to get the figures quickly to copy/paste what the GUI process monitor was showing. Again it's an observation/assumption I made, thought I'd pass it on. Cygwin could very well be handling things (more)poorly than *nix in this instance. >> Loaded 12264106 password hashes with 4096 different salts (Traditional >> DES [128/128 BS SSE2]) >> Remaining 12159811 password hashes with 4096 different salts > > Impressive. It's what I get for watching the KoreLogic twatter feed :) -rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.