Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:35:41 +0100 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: gcc versions On 01/05/2012 04:20 PM, Solar Designer wrote: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 03:56:16PM +0400, Solar Designer wrote: >> The 4.4.0 vs. 4.4.6 difference is curious. I may need to make more >> 4.4.x builds. > > So the change was between 4.4.4 and 4.4.5: Great! So it seems we should use 1-1-1 for any version of gcc older than 4.4.5. I presume there is a macro for the third digit. I'm still curious to know at what gcc version we would have to disable intrinsics completely. Maybe we should still do it for <4.0? I'm pretty sure we can assume 1-1-1 for 32-bit < 4.4.5 too even if untested. I do not think I have ever seen a 32-bit build getting a higher best para than 64-bit for a specific version. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.