Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 04:38:25 +0100 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: SSE/intrinsics for sapB/sapG [was: john-users] On 12/31/2011 03:37 AM, magnum wrote: > And how much would it take to introduce a way to do more 64-byte limbs, > for 128+ bytes of data? It turns out this is already supported. But I do not really understand how it can tell I'm doing full 64-byte blocks or not? I just fill them and postpone setting the length until the last (shorter) block. > Jim, Simon, how would I do a crypt of between 56 and 63 bytes? Is > this not possible? Can we actually only do 0-55 *or* 64-119 bytes? This question remains, and it's a blocker for sapG intrinsics. Is there a way? magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.