Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 19:59:50 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: 1.7.9-jumbo On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 06:48:33PM +0400, Solar Designer wrote: > Only in file 1: PIX MD5:Raw ... > Only in file 2: PIX MD5:Many salts > Only in file 2: PIX MD5:Only one salt 0010-j8-pix-md5-thin.diff changed BENCHMARK_LENGTH from -1 to 0. I think this is a bug since SALT_SIZE is 0. We should revert this format's BENCHMARK_LENGTH to -1. In fact, maybe bench.c should treat benchmark_length of 0 the same as -1 in case salt_size is 0. 1.7.8-jumbo-8: Benchmarking: PIX MD5 [pix-md5]... DONE Raw: 3785K c/s real, 3785K c/s virtual 1.7.9-jumbo-5: Benchmarking: PIX MD5 [SSE2i 10x4x3]... DONE Many salts: 11395K c/s real, 11509K c/s virtual Only one salt: 11503K c/s real, 11389K c/s virtual That's nice speedup. Too bad relbench does not see this because of the BENCHMARK_LENGTH bug. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.