Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 09:27:14 -0600 From: "jfoug" <jfoug@....net> To: <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: RE: cracking RADIUS shared secrets with john the ripper I have fixed johnswap.h It was not only an OSX thing, it was any build, other than gcc 4.3+, linux, or vc. As for the #if __linux__ block, should we change that to #if __GCC__ ?? There was also a problem with dynamic_fmt.c, where there were a couple of multiple defined junk, if the build was not one of the first 3 'types'. Pretty simple fix there. Simply remove the ROTATE_LEFT macros (they are defined in johnswap) I will get the changes made to dynamic to validate the HEX$ soon, hopefully this morning still. Jim. >-----Original Message----- >From: magnum [mailto:john.magnum@...hmail.com] >Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 7:44 AM >To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com >Subject: Re: [john-dev] cracking RADIUS shared secrets with john the >ripper > >2011-12-10 00:23, Didier Arenzana wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:52 PM, jfoug <jfoug@....net> wrote: >>> It has been posted as patch 0043- the salt() function now does all >of the >>> work, including figuring out what salts are identical. Dynamic >returns 4 >>> byte or 8 byte 'salts' back to john, which will always be unique. >These 4 >>> or 8 bytes are simply the data contents of a pointer. >> >> I have donwloaded and built the patch, and you will find attached a >> patch on top of this one, that contains the following modifications: >... > >I just posted a patch 0044 containing radius2john.pl and the dynamic >config (versions currently on >http://openwall.info/wiki/john/Using-john-to-crack-RADIUS-shared- >secrets). >I did not add the above mentioned modifications to dynamic_fmt, I'll >leave that to Jim. This johnswap.h vs OSX thing was unexpected, good >thing it was caught now. > >magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.