Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 20:48:08 +0100 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: mdfourmmx On Sat, 26 Nov 2011, Solar wrote >> The reason I was considering it is that it's like 3-4 extra lines of >> code in each format (bar the #ifdefs) once the .S file is there, given >> you already have SSExxxbody implemented in a format. > > Sorry, I don't know what you (Jim) are referring to here (the "it" in > "I was considering it"). That block of text was written by me. Jim's mail client and mine sometimes disagree about line wrapping so the quoting ended up a little broken. By the way I'm *now* quoting from the mail archive, I never got the mail I'm quoting here - or perhaps I accidentally deleted it somehow. OT, what I meant is that it's very easy to add mdfourmmx() to a format that already supports intrinsics. > OK. It sounds like the three of you (JimF, magnum, Simon) really want > to drop these older files in favor of the intrinsics. No, I don't mind keeping them although I have no use of them myself. Since they use the same buffer layout as the intrinsics, there is practically no extra work. I already have a working patch that adds Simons's MD4 .S as posted here (but modified a little): http://www.openwall.com/lists/john-users/2005/05/15/8 magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.