Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:18:25 +0100 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: more targets using sse-intrinsics.S 2011-11-15 19:49, magnum wrote: > Speaking of raw SHA1, I think we should add a tag for that one. In fact > we already have such a tag, namely $dynamic_26$. Like with dynamic, we > should support reading legacy (untagged) hashes from john.pot but always > write tags to new entries. Done, patch 0024. All incremental patches up to and including this one are regression tested for all builds I can produce: generic (64-bit) linux-x86-64-32-any linux-x86-64-32-mmx linux-x86-64-32-sse2 linux-x86-64-32-sse2i linux-x86-64 linux-x86-64i The same tests was made for my CVS-based tree too (with an additional salt_hash patch for all formats with hard-coded size). No problems known. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.