Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:46:21 +0400
From: Aleksey Cherepanov <>
Subject: Re: Johnny The GUI: prebuilt binaries for x86 and
 x86_64 are uploaded to the wiki

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 09:13:17PM +0400, Aleksey Cherepanov wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 06:59:23PM +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 07:52:18PM +0400, Aleksey Cherepanov wrote:
> > > Also there are versions built under KDE and under GNOME but I do not
> > > see any differences. Binary built under KDE works well under GNOME and
> > > looks like GNOME application. 'ldd' says similar things for both KDE
> > > and GNOME versions. Are they the same?
> > 
> > Yes, they're the same:
> > 
> > cmp -l johnny-6ae97db95fa989dca55aaef319a2839763aa018d-x86_64-gnome johnny-6ae97db95fa989dca55aaef319a2839763aa018d-x86_64-kde
> > echo $?
> > 
> > shows "0".
> Hmm, they should not be so similar. I guess that compiler produces
> different binaries every time even with one environment (for instance
> because it inserts timestamp into binary). So it seems to be my fault.
> I will check and fix it as soon as possible.

Everything is ok.

I tried to rebuild binaries but they are the same again. So my guess
about compiler was wrong (test with empty program showed me that gcc
produces the same ELFs for one code, while mingw produces different

Aleksey Cherepanov

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.