Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 06:51:33 +0400
From: Solar Designer <>
Subject: Re: Request for Comments on .conf file .remove [section] processing

Jim -

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 09:25:43PM -0500, JimF wrote:
> From: "Solar Designer" <>
> > Doesn't your code in -jumbo-7 already suppress duplicate rules in such cases?
> Yes, but only if things are run.  
> Even in your own exmpale, if we have something like this:

Indeed.  I deliberately made this example such that builtin rule
de-duplication would not be sufficient, to illustrate a possible use for
.remove - then I illustrated how .remove could be avoided.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.