Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 06:51:33 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Request for Comments on .conf file .remove [section] processing Jim - On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 09:25:43PM -0500, JimF wrote: > From: "Solar Designer" <solar@...nwall.com> > > Doesn't your code in -jumbo-7 already suppress duplicate rules in such cases? > > Yes, but only if things are run. > > Even in your own exmpale, if we have something like this: ... Indeed. I deliberately made this example such that builtin rule de-duplication would not be sufficient, to illustrate a possible use for .remove - then I illustrated how .remove could be avoided. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.