Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:28:29 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: john-1.7.8-mscashcuda-0.diff Lukas, I've just spent a few minutes with john-1.7.8-mscashcuda-0.diff. Unfortunately, it does not work for me: [user@...alhost src]$ time ../run/john -te -fo=mscashcuda Benchmarking: MSCASHCUDA ... FAILED (get_hash(0)) real 0m0.681s user 0m0.009s sys 0m0.509s I guess it might be something similar to the issue with john-1.7.8-allcuda-0.2.diff, where 3 of 4 hash types fail for me, but work for you. You mentioned it's related to GPU family differences, and that you know how to fix it, so I think you don't need additional detail. Another thing I noticed is that the valid() function is unreliable: it doesn't handle the case when strrchr() returns NULL, and it uses a char expression as array subscript (should use the ARCH_INDEX() macro there). I guess that's normal for a patch that you haven't even announced in here yet, and I hope you'll provide and announce a revised version soon. The 20k c/s you mentioned (on the wiki) you're getting on your card sounds good to me. Oh, and I think you need to rename s/mscash/mscash2/g everything in this patch (and its name). Thanks, Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.