Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:02:34 +0200
From: magnum <rawsmooth@...dband.net>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: 45% wordlist boost just waiting to happen

On 2011-08-17 13:30, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 09:35:44PM +0200, magnum wrote:
>> These lines in wordlist.c always nagged me:
>>
>>    #if 0&&  ARCH_ALLOWS_UNALIGNED
>>    /* XXX: somehow this breaks things - why? */
>>            line = words[nCurLine++];
>>    #else
>>            strcpy(line, words[nCurLine++]);
>>    #endif
>
> As far as I recall, JimF's original patch adding in-memory wordlists
> only had the strcpy() here.  When merging the patch, I noticed that this
> was inefficient, so I added the #if ARCH_ALLOWS_UNALIGNED and pointer
> assignment.  However, somehow this did not work right.  I did not
> investigate, and simply added the "0&&" then.  That's all.

I believe I found the problem. You actually had another XXX comment 
hinting about it, but I didn't fully understand the issue until seeing 
in valgrind what happened. Easy fix then.

>> This made for a stunning 45% boost running a wordlist + rules against LM.
>
> That's impressive.  Perhaps when you apply the -fast-des-key-setup-3
> patch, the boost for LM may be even higher.

Yes, I think I used omp4. I tried again now, using nsk3:

LM, 1 hash, rockyou -ru: 57% boost!
NT, 1 hash, rockyou -ru: 38% boost

Patch posted to wiki soon. It's a pity I didn't find this before the 
contest :(

magnum

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.