Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 12:01:46 +0200
From: magnum <>
Subject: Re: prepare() vs. split()

On 2011-07-06 05:22, Solar Designer wrote:
> In this case, though, don't we actually want valid() to accept either
> syntax?  That's how things were done e.g. for LM accepting both full
> hashes with no tags and half-hashes with $LM$ tags.

But then we need to modify binary() too. I prefer prepare() for the 
least intrusive change. BUT before doing this anywhere I think we should 
establish the reason for those parens being there in the first place! 
Maybe Vasiliy actually got them with parens and mistakenly removed them?


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.