Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 12:01:46 +0200 From: magnum <rawsmooth@...dband.net> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: prepare() vs. split() On 2011-07-06 05:22, Solar Designer wrote: > In this case, though, don't we actually want valid() to accept either > syntax? That's how things were done e.g. for LM accepting both full > hashes with no tags and half-hashes with $LM$ tags. But then we need to modify binary() too. I prefer prepare() for the least intrusive change. BUT before doing this anywhere I think we should establish the reason for those parens being there in the first place! Maybe Vasiliy actually got them with parens and mistakenly removed them? magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.