Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 00:36:32 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: 1.7.8.Jumbo-1 Jim - On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 03:23:56PM -0500, JimF wrote: > From: "Solar Designer" <solar@...nwall.com> ... > >I guess john-1.7.7-jumbo-6-jimfpatch-4.diff will need to be enhanced to > >include ZIP under the #if's as well, if I include that. SSH_PDF_RAR > >will probably need to be changed to something like NON_HASHES, although > >-jumbo supports a few other non-hashes as well (TGTs, S/Key). > > If it has the oSSL 1.0+ requirement, then yes. The change is not so much > keeping the 'non-hash' types out, it is the reliance on SSL that is newer > than some older systems would have. Same for the SHA256 stuff. Then the patch should be reworked to use the same approach that john-1.7.7-jumbo-6-auto_have_sha256-03.diff.gz does. Would you do that? I am tempted not to apply john-1.7.7-jumbo-6-jimfpatch-4.diff for now, because it does not apply on top of john-1.7.7-jumbo-6-zip-0.diff.gz anyway (most hunks are rejected) and because fixing it to make it apply feels like a waste of time (I think it needs to be re-done to check the OpenSSL version number). I might include the DOMINOSEC_fmt.c, lotus5_fmt.c, and sapB_fmt.c hunks now, though. Thanks, Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.