Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 19:20:11 -0500 From: "JimF" <jfoug@....net> To: <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: Makefile LN = ln -sf I can not comment on the -sf to -s -f. For the sparc, no it was not there. I build both 64 and 32 bit, and was having issues prior to the RM However, the -sf to -s -f was done, and then I started having problems. That may go away if the -sf works as you mention below. Jim. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Solar Designer" <solar@...nwall.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 6:35 PM > Jim, magnum - > > In -jumbo-5, there are these changes (which were not in -jumbo-1): > > -LN = ln -sf > +LN = ln -f -s > > solaris-sparc64-cc: > + $(RM) arch.h > $(LN) sparc64.h arch.h > > and similar for other Solaris targets. > > Why? Didn't the original Makefile work fine on Solaris? > > Then, why make both changes at once? Are they unrelated or are they > both an attempt to fix the same issue? > > Normally, the "-f" option to "ln -s" tells it to remove existing > destination files before creating the symlink, so the $(RM) shouldn't be > needed. Also, normally "ln -sf" is the same as "ln -f -s".
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.