[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 16:54:12 +0200
From: magnum <rawsmooth@...dband.net>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Compiler warnings
On 2011-06-02 14:00, Solar Designer wrote:
>> DES_bs_b.c: In function ???DES_bs_crypt???:
>> DES_bs_b.c:767:2: warning: ???zero??? is used uninitialized in this function
>> DES_bs_b.c: In function ???DES_bs_crypt_25???:
>> DES_bs_b.c:863:2: warning: ???zero??? is used uninitialized in this function
>> DES_bs_b.c: In function ???DES_bs_crypt_LM???:
>> DES_bs_b.c:973:2: warning: ???zero??? is used uninitialized in this function
>
> I am not aware of a way to get rid of these without making the code
> slightly worse. Are you?
I did try some "pragma disable warning" variant some time ago but gcc
did not understand it. Not sure if there is some other syntax that will
work, or if gcc just plain doesn't support it - I haven't had the time
to investigate more. It's not very important, just nice to get rid of
them when in fact nothing is wrong.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
