Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 02:24:04 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: AVX in Intel Sandy Bridge On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 09:58:10AM +0200, bartavelle wrote: > On 05/05/2011 21:50, Solar Designer wrote: > > I gave it a try yesterday, on a Core i7-2600K, non-overclocked (3.4 GHz > > standard, up to 3.8 GHz Turbo Boost), Ubuntu 11.04, x86_64, Ubuntu's gcc > > 4.5.2. No luck. > > I have no Sandy Bridge available to test this, but it might be good idea > to check the code gcc generated to see if it is "obviously" bad. If it > is, it might be a good idea to check clang and icc results. Good point. I am not going to revisit this until I replace the S-box expressions (which is planned anyway), but you (or anyone else) may. I've just committed the 256+128 code, so it's available via anoncvs and may be enabled by editing an "#elif 0" in x86-64.h. http://cvsweb.openwall.com/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/Owl/packages/john/john/src/ Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.