Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:24:01 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: move most GSoC discussions to john-dev Oops, I meant to send the below to john-users rather than john-dev, and I just did. In the message below, "in here" refers to john-users. For now, my advice is that whoever wants to apply for the GSoC tasks should be on both john-dev and john-users. Sorry for the mess. I knew it would be difficult to draw the line, which is why john-dev did not exist until recently. But we're going to need it for truly development-focused discussions, and I think it's best to start moving most GSoC stuff to john-dev. On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 05:18:05PM +0400, Solar Designer wrote: > Hi, > > I think we should start moving GSoC discussions to john-dev. So far, > some occurred on john-users and some on john-dev. We got useful > comments from some folks who are on john-users but not on -dev (yet?), > but we shouldn't be abusing john-users for discussions around JtR > development indefinitely. I am going to continue replying to messages > in existing threads in here, and others are encouraged to do so as well, > but please join john-dev and start new development focused threads on > john-dev from now on. You may subscribe here: > > http://www.openwall.com/john/#lists > > It is still appropriate to post to john-users when we need users' > feedback on proposed functionality or when we have anything ready for > end users (e.g., a useful patch). However, advanced discussions of > source code, etc. should proceed on john-dev. > > Thanks, > > Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.