[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 01:45:02 +0200
From: Katja Malvoni <kmalvoni@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Parallella: bcrypt
Hi Yaniv,
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Yaniv Sapir <yaniv@...pteva.com> wrote:
> Katja,
>
> Can you clarify this: "If I compile with -O3 I get 979 c/s. But compiling
> with -O3 has negative impact on e-gcc generated code, speed drops to 875
> c/s. "
>
> ... so -O3 is better or worse?
>
For my BF_ROUND written in assembly it's slightly better (979 c/s vs 976
c/s). For BF_ROUND written in C and compiled with e-gcc is worse, speed is
932 c/s when compiled with -O2 and 875 c/s when compiled with -O3.
Katja
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
