Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 08:20:18 +0530
From: Sayantan Datta <std2048@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: AMD GCN ISA development

Hi Ronak,

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Ronak <rixor786@...il.com> wrote:

> While trying to align .isa in the inner elf of .elf, I had this thought,
> how kernel is going to run, if we decide to update .il and .isa
> simultaneously, such that each update will be different. With this, we have
> inconsistent kernel. Now two questions need to be asked..
> ** which update will actually run
>
I think it depends on which option you are using at runtime. e.g
"-fno-bin-amdil -fbin-exe" will run the .isa while "fbin-amdil
-fno-bin-exe" should run the il. By default if nothing is specified .isa
will run.

>
> **  Updating both files, will it add to the flexibility of optimizing
> opencl kernels.
>
Yes, it might. If the isa fails(which will for most devices) we might
fallback to il which is more versatile.

Regards,
Sayantan

Content of type "text/html" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ