Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 06:55:34 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: xvendor@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: obfuscating e-mails in RPM specs On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 08:24:57PM +0200, Andreas Ericsson wrote: > Solar Designer wrote: > >The syntax we might use is this: > > > >* Sat Sep 24 2005 Solar Designer <solar at owl.openwall.com> 3.6.1p2-owl15 > > This is a bit too common. Most harvesting engines will understand it if > they try at all. I've been using the above syntax on websites for a few years and it's worked well so far. I realize that it's only a matter of time until _some_ (definitely not all) harvesting bots will start to pick it up. > Others are doing the same with various syntaxes. In RPM spec files? If you're aware of some examples, please point me at them. Anyway, I am now converting our spec files to use the following syntax: -* Fri May 06 2005 Solar Designer <solar@....openwall.com> 1.0.3-owl1 +* Fri May 06 2005 Solar Designer <solar-at-owl.openwall.com> 1.0.3-owl1 E-mail addresses not in RPM %changelog's (in comments, in documentation files, etc.) will continue to use spaces instead of the dashes. Thanks to everyone who responded! -- Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the xvendor mailing list charter.
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ