[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 22:26:55 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: gcc update
Hi Georgi,
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 03:32:14AM +0300, Georgi Geshev wrote:
> I've built the GCC 4.6.0 (no patches applied), GMP 4.3.2 (appropriate
> Fedora patches applied), MPFR 3.0.1 (no patches applied) and MPC 0.9 (no
> patches applied) packages, though I still need to clean up and improve
> the spec files.
Great. Please post your spec files in here - as they are, before you
spend any more time on them. I'd like to take a look, and others might
provide helpful comments as well.
> Here's the list of packages that initially failed to build with the new
> compiler toolchain -
>
> cpio
> elfutils-libelf
> flex
> glibc
> kernel
> libtool
> mdadm
> perl
> shadow-utils
> util-linux
> vim
>
> I'll do my best to further resolve the build issues.
Before you do, please post excerpts from build logs showing just how
these packages failed to build.
For others in here - Georgi only did this test on i686 so far (not
x86_64 yet). (That's fine, I merely want it mentioned.)
Thanks,
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
