Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 09:38:52 -0400 From: Scott Arciszewski <scott@...agonie.com> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: CVE for crypto_get_random() from libsrtp On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Adam Maris <amaris@...hat.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I've got question whether this bug > (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793971) is CVE-worthy? > Could it be classified as CWE-330: Use of Insufficiently Random Values? > > According to the SRTP documentation > (http://srtp.sourcearchive.com/documentation/1.4.2.dfsg/group__SRTP_g1d4c228c6a58096dfab3cefbabd66f17.html), > it provides 80 bits of random data, which is quite a borderline. > > Thanks. > > -- > Adam Maris / Red Hat Product Security > I would consider 80 bits insufficient for cryptography, but it's not really exploitably weak (like, say, rand() would be). Whether or not it warrants a CVE is obviously MITRE's discretion. 2^80 is out of reach for most people to brute force in 2015 (maybe even for intelligence agencies), but 2^100 is generally the lower bound of acceptable. Just my $0.02. Scott Arciszewski Chief Development Officer Paragon Initiative Enterprises <https://paragonie.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ