|
|
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:54:21 +0200
From: Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov@...hat.com>
To: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>
CC: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: CVE Request (minor) -- Two Munin graphing framework flaws
Hello Kurt, Steve, vendors,
the following three problems has been recently reported against Munin:
[1] Insecure temp file use in the qmailscan plug-in:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812889
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668778
[2] Possibility to inject escape sequences into Munin's log file:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812885
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668666
[3] Remote users can fill /tmp filesystem:
Red Hat would not consider this to be a security flaw =>
no RH BTS entry.
Original report:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668667
For the first two -- though both of them having minor security impact,
under suitable circumstances they could lead to trust boundary crossing =>
under our opinion they should get a (CVE-2012-*) identifiers.
For the third issue -- we wouldn't consider it to be a security
flaw. Just as something, which on improperly configured machine
could allow to fill in /tmp filesystem (just another way how to
do it, when the particular service isn't properly configured).
Could you allocate CVE ids for the first two issues?
Thank you && Regards, Jan.
--
Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.