Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:54:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Josh Bressers <bressers@...hat.com> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Cc: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@...hat.com>, "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org> Subject: Re: CVE Request -- Python -- accept() implementation in async core is broken => more subcases Any update on this Steve? Thanks. -- JB ----- "Josh Bressers" <bressers@...hat.com> wrote: > Steve, > > I'm going to leave this one up to you. While it's really a python bug, > I > suspect several affected projects will end up patching themselves (I'm > not > sure how MITRE hadnles this situation). > > Thanks. > > -- > JB > > > ----- "Jan Lieskovsky" <jlieskov@...hat.com> wrote: > > > Hello Steve, vendors, > > > > Giampaolo Rodola reported a deficiency in the implementation of > > Python's accept() routine: > >  http://bugs.python.org/issue6706 > > > > The following seems to be all symptoms for the same issue: > > A, SMTP (smtpd.py): > >  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632200 > >  http://bugs.python.org/issue9129 > > > > B, pyftpdlib: > >  http://code.google.com/p/pyftpdlib/issues/detail?id=104 > > > > C, ZODB: > >  https://bugs.launchpad.net/zodb/+bug/135108 > > > > D, more? > > > > Not sure, how to proceed in this case: > > i, if assign only one CVE id for  or, > > ii, assign also separate CVE ids for the child symptoms? (, , > > ) > > > > Cc-ed David Malcom on this post, to shed more light how to handle > this > > case. > > > > Once the way, how to further proceed with this, specified. Steve > could > > you allocate CVE id (ids)? > > > > Thanks && Regards, Jan. > > -- > > Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ