Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 20:32:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Josh Bressers <bressers@...hat.com> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Cc: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@...hat.com>, "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org> Subject: Re: CVE Request -- Python -- accept() implementation in async core is broken => more subcases Steve, I'm going to leave this one up to you. While it's really a python bug, I suspect several affected projects will end up patching themselves (I'm not sure how MITRE hadnles this situation). Thanks. -- JB ----- "Jan Lieskovsky" <jlieskov@...hat.com> wrote: > Hello Steve, vendors, > > Giampaolo Rodola reported a deficiency in the implementation of > Python's accept() routine: >  http://bugs.python.org/issue6706 > > The following seems to be all symptoms for the same issue: > A, SMTP (smtpd.py): >  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632200 >  http://bugs.python.org/issue9129 > > B, pyftpdlib: >  http://code.google.com/p/pyftpdlib/issues/detail?id=104 > > C, ZODB: >  https://bugs.launchpad.net/zodb/+bug/135108 > > D, more? > > Not sure, how to proceed in this case: > i, if assign only one CVE id for  or, > ii, assign also separate CVE ids for the child symptoms? (, , > ) > > Cc-ed David Malcom on this post, to shed more light how to handle this > case. > > Once the way, how to further proceed with this, specified. Steve could > you allocate CVE id (ids)? > > Thanks && Regards, Jan. > -- > Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ