[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:59:28 -0700
From: Vincent Danen <vdanen@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE request for proftpd
* [2009-02-11 11:16:14 -0800] TJ Saunders wrote:
>> >As discussed there, this is a duplicate of an earlier bug:
>> >
>> > http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3124
>> >
>> >and has been fixed in ProFTPD 1.3.2rc3 and later.
>>
>> Oh, forgot to ask. It looks like this would have been introduced in
>> 1.3.1. Is that correct? So the affected versions would be
>> 1.3.1 to 1.3.2rc2.
>
>That's correct.
Great. Thanks for that clarification.
>> Also, as I was looking at the Gentoo report, I noticed bug #3173 which
>> likely also needs a CVE name (for the "encoding-dependent SQL injection
>> vulnerability").
>
>Yes; I was just about to note the same thing. =)
Steve, can we get a second CVE name that references
http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3173
Thanks much.
--
Vincent Danen / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
