[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:14:21 +0200
From: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, dwmw2@...radead.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jarod@...hat.com,
jogo@...nwrt.org, david.heidelberger@...t.cz, maillist-linux@...fooze.de,
mikko.rapeli@....fi, musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] uapi glibc compat: fix musl libc compatibility
On 04/20/2017 10:36 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 21:14:37 +0100
>
>> I agree, except I don't think you're going far enough. Those "standard
>> names" you mention... some of this stuff actually depends on __GLIBC__,
>> and *that* isn't right either.
>
> Yep, that's something that needs correcting.
>
Should all libc implementations define __GLIBC__ or could we at least
switch the kernel UAPI to !__KERNEL__ here?
Hauke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
