Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 14:17:53 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jarod@...hat.com,
  jogo@...nwrt.org, david.heidelberger@...t.cz, maillist-linux@...fooze.de, 
 mikko.rapeli@....fi, musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] uapi glibc compat: fix musl libc compatibility

On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 15:14 +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> 
> On 04/20/2017 10:36 PM, David Miller wrote:
> > 
> > From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
> > Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 21:14:37 +0100
> > 
> > > 
> > > I agree, except I don't think you're going far enough. Those
> > > "standard
> > > names" you mention... some of this stuff actually depends on
> > > __GLIBC__,
> > > and *that* isn't right either.
> > Yep, that's something that needs correcting.
> > 
> Should all libc implementations define __GLIBC__ or could we at least
> switch the kernel UAPI to !__KERNEL__ here?

I'd start with the patch I referenced yesterday...
[ CONTENT OF TYPE application/x-pkcs7-signature SKIPPED ]

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ