[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 21:22:14 -0500
From: Gregor Richards <gr@...due.edu>
To: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
CC: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Latest pkgsrc results [What builds on musl 0.9.13?]
On 11/06/2013 09:01 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> * Gregor Richards <gr@...due.edu> [2013-11-06 19:34:47 -0500]:
>> Here are the results from my latest build of NetBSD pkgsrc 2013Q2 on
>> musl 0.9.13, with patches from
>> http://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-pkgsrc-patches revision
>> b44694ce2dd6.
>>
>> Attempted: 11270
>> Deps failed: 3248
>> Build tried: 8022
>> Build failed: 912
>> Tests failed: 1824
>> Success: 5286 (65.8938%)
> it would be nice if you saved all the build logs
> of failed builds and published them as well
>
> i dont expect interesting findings: i assume most
> failures are bad includes, bad ifdefs or bad config
>
> but i'd like to see this theory verified
>
>> Breakdown:
>> https://sites.google.com/a/codu.org/musl/pkgsrc-results/pkgsrc-results-2013Q2-b44694ce2dd6-musl-0.9.13-breakdown.txt?attredirects=0&d=1
>> or http://wiki.musl-libc.org/pkgsrc_results
> http://wiki.musl-libc.org/wiki/pkgsrc_results
I do in fact save the build logs, but as a single log.txt. As it's
multiple hundreds of megs, I historically wasn't bothering to put them
anywhere.
I've uploaded the complete log for this run to Google Drive:
https://googledrive.com/host/0BwnS5DMB0YQ6Tjd4Z2RXeTdlaDA/pkgsrc-results-2013Q2-b44694ce2dd6-musl-0.9.13-log.txt.xz
. If there's demand, I'll find a less silly solution in the future.
With valediction,
- Gregor Richards
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
