Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 03:01:20 +0100
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: Gregor Richards <gr@...due.edu>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Latest pkgsrc results [What builds on musl 0.9.13?]

* Gregor Richards <gr@...due.edu> [2013-11-06 19:34:47 -0500]:
> Here are the results from my latest build of NetBSD pkgsrc 2013Q2 on
> musl 0.9.13, with patches from
> http://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-pkgsrc-patches revision
> b44694ce2dd6.
> 
> Attempted:	11270
> Deps failed:	3248
> Build tried:	8022
> Build failed:	912
> Tests failed:	1824
> Success:	5286 (65.8938%)

it would be nice if you saved all the build logs
of failed builds and published them as well

i dont expect interesting findings: i assume most
failures are bad includes, bad ifdefs or bad config

but i'd like to see this theory verified

> Breakdown:
> https://sites.google.com/a/codu.org/musl/pkgsrc-results/pkgsrc-results-2013Q2-b44694ce2dd6-musl-0.9.13-breakdown.txt?attredirects=0&d=1
> or http://wiki.musl-libc.org/pkgsrc_results

http://wiki.musl-libc.org/wiki/pkgsrc_results

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.