[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:10:03 +0200
From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@...too.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: musl 0.9.14 released
On 24/09/13 15:51, John Spencer wrote:
>> Sometime soon I also want to focus on what the development and release
>> model post-1.0 will be, especially whether we'll aim to maintain a
>> 'stable' branch with minimal new features alongside new development.
>
> having a stable branch which only gets backports of bugfixes makes sense
> if we aim for inclusion in conservative distributions.
> if nothing else, it signals that we care about stability.
> otoh it's much more work to maintain...
If you want a stable branch I found _really_ useful having tags such as
CC: musl-stable@...l-libc.org
But you need at least 2 people doing the actual backporting weekly.
lu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
