|
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 06:02:16 +0000 From: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com> To: "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Colin Vidal <colin@...dal.org> Subject: RE: self introduction On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 09:09:42PM +0200, Colin Vidal wrote: > Hi David, > > > If you're interested, the HARDENED_ATOMIC team is looking for people > > to help porting the feature to other architectures. ARM is a > > reasonable candidate for someone new to the project. I have begun > > this effort myself, but if you'd like to collaborate I'd be > > grateful. > > Sounds good! > > > It essentially involves porting the original arch-specific features > > from PAX_REFCOUNT into Elena Reshetova's official HARDENED_ATOMIC > > tree, which can be found at > > https://github.com/esreshetova/linux-stable > > The link seems broken (https://github.com/esreshetova too). I found > https://github.com/dwindsor/hardened-atomic but it is empty. Did I > miss something/Github filter? >Typo in the link, I think? >https://github.com/ereshetova/linux-stable This branch to be precise: https://github.com/ereshetova/linux-stable/tree/hardened_atomic_on_next This is where the latest code for linux-next is hosted now and where we work with David and Hans. > > Please contact me if you have any questions; I'd be glad to help! > > I actually have question. :-) As far as I understand, PAX_REFCOUNT [1] > is mainly a x86-only >No, PAX_REFCOUNT also supports a bunch of other architectures. As far as I can tell from a quick look: ARM, MIPS, PowerPC and SPARC. Yes, just in our patch series we only made implementation for x86. But if you look into Grsecurity/PaX patches, it has support for others implemented.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.