[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 21:24:57 +0100
From: HacKurx <hackurx@...il.com>
To: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Project convention on configuration options
First, respect the work of others...
https://twitter.com/ioerror/status/636677916365996032
So I hope you are not here for nothing...
Sorry for such a comment here but I don't like attitude of your enterprise.
2015-12-11 18:57 GMT+01:00 Schaufler, Casey <casey.schaufler@...el.com>:
>
>
> I’m starting to look at PAX_USERCOPY and immediately hit
> the question of what to do about configuration option name.
> I assume that retaining PAX_USERCOPY is not the right thing
> to do, but what should be used instead? HARD_USERCOPY?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
--
Best regards,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
