Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2018 22:16:24 -0500 From: jfoug <jfoug@...nwall.net> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com, magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> Subject: Re: Using PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256 On 6/9/2018 6:40 PM, magnum wrote: > That's valid data for sure, but it's 44 bytes and that hash doesn't > load - I have no idea why. I believe JimF wrote the current > incarnation of the format. AFAIK, the input string was an ITW format, and thus processed as it is. I was provided the input hashes, and wrote the format to use them. Why they are the way they are, I can not say for sure.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ