Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 02:06:31 +0100
From: Rafael Waldo Delgado Doblas <lord.rafa@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Parallella: Litecoin mining

Hello,

2013/8/10 Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>

> This is good news, although the target performance is much higher - I'd
> guesstimate 3 kh/s with pure C and 4-5 kh/s with asm code.  (We had a
> smaller difference between pure C and asm for Katja's bcrypt code - with
> best asm speed being about 20% higher than best C speed - but for scrypt
> I'd expect a bigger difference due to potential use of IMADD for bit
> rotates, and due to Salsa20 containing relatively more ADDs than XORs,
> as compared to Blowfish.)
>
> OK.  At a later time, you could even try 4.5, if you make your code
> really compact.  (Of course, supporting a TMTO factor that is not a
> whole number requires slightly different code.)
>
> I think at this time your priority should be to find out why you're not
> getting more than 1.15 kh/s at TMTO factor 6.  You could get something
> like 2+ kh/s with pure C code with it, with more optimal code (this is
> just my gut feeling, though).
>

> Is the code based off scrypt's -ref or -nosse?  Anyhow, even -nosse
> performed a lot of unnecessary data copying.  This is something I
> optimized in escrypt, but only in -sse code.  If the problem is indeed
> still present in the code you're using, you could compare escrypt's
> crypto_scrypt-sse.c against the original in scrypt-1.1.6.tgz and
> implement similar optimizations (I mean removing blkxor and blkcpy) for
> whatever code revision you have.
>
>
Ok I working on it right now.

It looks reasonable to me, except that I did not expect you'd have this
> much pre-initialized data (2.5 KB).  What is it?
>

Mmm almost 1.4K is "volatile shared_buf_t M[16] SECTION("shared_dram");"
Actually I donít know why because is not pre-initialized.

The rest is weird because even if only have the main function without
anything more, I got 1128B of pre-initialized data.


> > Why the only information is about text, data and bss sections?.
>
> What else did you expect to see there?  Your scratch space that you use
> for scrypt's V?  How do you allocate it?
>

There other sections defined in the linker scrypt:
.shared_dram for example.

The scratch space is defined as static memory "char
scratchpad[SCRATCHBUF_SIZE];"

Regards,
Rafael.

[ CONTENT OF TYPE text/html SKIPPED ]

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ