[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 17:36:41 -0600
From: "jfoug" <jfoug@....net>
To: <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: RE: LM & NT prepare() segfaults
>I'd appreciate it if you look into this and upload a patch - having all
>prepare()'s check for NULL before using fields beyond the 2nd and/or
>having the loader set those to "" when parsing the pot.
Will do. Likely both. But I do not want to depend upon check for null in
existing formats, only to have a new format come along that does not check.
I would rather put in the checks in the formats which do check, and then
make sure that pot loader sends non-null values across for those fields.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
