[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 07:25:56 -0600
From: "JimF" <jfoug@....net>
To: <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: inadvertent OpenMP 3.0 dependencies
This was the only instance that I saw. VC also uses 2.5 (I believe). At least it complained about needing a signed int.
Jim.
From: "Solar Designer" <solar@...nwall.com>
> magnum -
>
> I think it is desirable for our code to also build with compilers that
> support only OpenMP 2.5, but not OpenMP 3.0+. One of these is gcc
> versions 4.2.x and 4.3.x. (OpenMP 3.0 is available starting with gcc
> 4.4, as far as I understand.) Another is EKOPath 4:
>
> http://www.pathscale.com/ekopath4-open-source-announcement
>
> 0024-j7-sapB-sapG-added-OMP-and-proper-hash-functions.patch
> inadvertently introduced a dependency on OpenMP 3.0 here:
>
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> +#ifdef _OPENMP
> +#pragma omp parallel for
> +#endif
> + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>
> In OpenMP 2.5, the loop variable should be signed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
