Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:36:49 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Aleksey's Status Report - #5 of 15

Shinnok,

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:01:47PM +0300, Shinnok wrote:
> Alexander, 2 clause BSD is ok,

Yes, but:

> or something else more appropriate for
> JtR, as specified here http://openwall.info/wiki/john/licensing?

Yes, I prefer 0-clause BSD, so to speak.  Just the copyright and
permission statements that you'd find in a BSD license, but with the
restrictive clauses completely removed.  I simply see no reason to
impose those restrictions.

This is what I use for my own code lately (with some exceptions) - e.g.,
blists, which we released earlier this month, is fully under this kind
of license.

Thanks,

Alexander

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ