Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 21:43:27 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: xvendor@...ts.openwall.com Subject: obfuscating e-mails in RPM specs Hi, We're about to start obfuscating e-mail addresses in our RPM spec files, and we intend to update all of our existing specs accordingly. The syntax we might use is this: * Sat Sep 24 2005 Solar Designer <solar at owl.openwall.com> 3.6.1p2-owl15 My questions are: 1. Are others doing the same? What syntax is being used? 2. Is this known to break any software processing spec files or RPMs? In particular, I guess the extra spaces might break the separation of fields, so should they be avoided? Maybe use dashes instead? 3. Is it even worthwhile to try to come up with a common syntax for this? Thanks, -- Alexander Peslyak <solar at openwall.com> GPG key ID: B35D3598 fp: 6429 0D7E F130 C13E C929 6447 73C3 A290 B35D 3598 http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the xvendor mailing list charter.
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ