[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 08:37:15 +0200 (CEST)
From: Bernhard Fischer <bernhard@...chli.org>
To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Virtual Machines on Owl
Am Do 10.05.2007 08:06 schrieb (GalaxyMaster) <galaxy@....openwall.com>:
> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 07:40:33AM +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>
> > I already found an answer in a formerly posting form you!
> >
> > ...
> > Although Owl currently supports only 2.4 it isn't hard to rebuild it
>
> Moreover, it isn't strictly needed to rebuild Owl for 2.6 to run under
> OpenVZ. A "vanilla" binary Owl distribution works perfectly both
> outside and inside the VPSes. :) JFYI.
>
> P.S. However, I'm building the OpenVZ kernel from sources since I want
> to have our klogd working (there is a small patch needed to allow our
> klogd to grab messages from the kernel log buffer).
Does it mean, you are using Owl with an OpenVZ-patched-vanilla
2.6-kernel (without Owl-patches) for both systems (host and virtual
guest)?
-
Bernhard
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail owl-users-unsubscribe@...ts.openwall.com and reply
to the automated confirmation request that will be sent to you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
