[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 09:44:17 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Postfix and procmail delivery ?
On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 08:31:05AM +0300, Jarno Huuskonen wrote:
> OK, this time I tested it (set showq to private in master.cf)
> (with postfix-20010228pl05 though):
> As root:
> mailq: warning: Mail system is down -- accessing queue directly
> Mail queue is empty
>
> As normal user:
> mailq: fatal: Queue report unavailable - mail system is down
>
> Seems to do the job: Well I'd prefer a different error message ;)
Yes. I did this test before sending my first reply on this, too.
> > To me, the problem with it is that it remains possible to flush the
> > queue. And restricting qmgr in the same way (via master.cf) breaks
> > things. I haven't checked the code to see what can be done, yet.
>
> I browsed the postfix mailinlist archives and there was some
> discussion about restricting mailq/flushing the queue. I got the
> impression that Wietse might implement the feature if people convince
> to him that it's necessary.
So maybe you could help us achieve this? ;-)
I don't feel like complaining about the issues I know of when we're
still using an ancient version. We really need to update first.
--
/sd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
