[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 22:21:54 +0400
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: gcc 4.6.1
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 21:00 +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> > > Are there any known runtime issues with Owl packages rebuilt with gcc
> > > 4.6.1?
> >
> > Currently the rebuilded groff segfaults. The issue is somewhere in glibc
> > symbol table (__sincos() calls itself forever). I'm afraid there will
> > be more such weird issues - we should update glibc itself soon.
> >
> > I'll likely change glibc fix - patch "inline" instances instead of
> > passing -fgnu89-inline in CFLAGS.
>
> Actually, you must revise the glibc fix. I can't even reasonably
> distworld the current fix because it broke builds with gcc 3.4.5, which
> does not recognize -fgnu89-inline.
Actually, it is wrong even for gcc 4.6.1 :-) I'll try to find the right
solution tomorrow.
--
Vasiliy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
